Should teachers try to create order from chaos? Or should we try to achieve the opposite - turning order into chaos? Let me explain. The human mind naturally and subconsciously seeks order, pattern, closure - the Gestalt psychology experiments of Max Wertheimer, Kurt Koffka and Wolfgang Kohler from the previous century has established that. We are oh so comfortable with order and predictability. We know what is coming next, we can control it, and it doesn't tax our minds that much. But for today's schools and universities, where we should be trying to 'draw out from within', surely order and predictability run counter to creative learning and self-driven critical enquiry. Shouldn't we be taking learners outside their comfort zones? For far too long, schools have been providing learners with definitive answers to sterile questions, and there is usually only one answer. Yet we can do so much more by encouraging students to question for themselves. We would see a great deal more evidence of critical thinking if we taught students to question more and answer less. One of my colleagues once said that he preferred to send his students out of the classroom confused. That way, they would be more likely to resolve their own cognitive dissonance by going off and doing some personal research to see if they could resolve their own confusion.
So should be try to achieve chaos from order? Should we attempt to subvert the ordered, linear curricula that we are commanded and expected to deliver? Should teachers try to create uncertain, and dare I say it - dangerous - environments within which students can question and argue? Do we need anarchy in the school system? Sugata Mitra, who is famous for his Hole in the Wall experiments, believes in what he calls minimally invasive education, where students can use tools to find out for themselves. He argues that all the answers are already there on the web for learners to discover for themselves. The new roles of teachers are to ask timely and relevant questions - searching ones that will stretch students and cause them to research for themselves. For a long time problem based learning has been a mainstay of the training of medical students. Present the students with a problem, and they will need to find a solution to resolve the dissonance. Along with many others, I have taken this a step farther by presenting my students with ill-structured problems. These are problems that have very few parameters and very little information. Students are forced to 'fill in the gaps' usually drawing on previous knowledge, before they can find their own personal solutions to the problem. Moreover, there are many possible solutions to ill-structured problems.
Such problem based learning takes a little time, and with the addition of a shared discussion space, develops over time, but the understanding of the topic is ultimately far deeper than if students were served up the answers on a plate. Maurice Holt provides an excellent argument for 'slower education' in his blog post Fresh Thinking about Schooling, and I quote:
"Since education is essentially about equipping our children with the ability to act responsibly in a complex society, the idea of a Slow School follows very readily from the metaphor of Slow. It brings to mind an institution where students have time to discuss, argue, and reflect upon knowledge and ideas, and so come to understand themselves and the culture they will inherit."
Much of the power of setting ill-structured problems for students is that they can post their solutions (and the reasoning behind them) onto shared online spaces such as wikis, where they will then have the task to defend their solution against criticism from the rest of the group. Students also have licence to attack the solutions of their peers. Learners need to think on their feet against all comers, and of course they learn by synthesising the best elements from other people's solutions. So, light the blue touch paper, stand back, and let the chaos commence....
Image source by Christopher Hubenthal
Light the blue touch paper... by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
No comments:
Post a Comment